QIn regards to Glyphosate patent as an antibiotic. Has there been any research to test and see if glyphosateresistant bacteria in soil sprayed regularly with glyphosate, are also resistant to antibiotics used in humans. So, has it been shown that mechani

In regards to Glyphosate patent as an antibiotic. Has there been any research to test and see if glyphosateresistant bacteria in soil sprayed regularly with glyphosate, are also resistant to antibiotics used in humans. So, has it been shown that mechanism of action that causes a bacteria to be resistant to glyphosate also causes resistance in any other antibiotics?

AExpert Answer

Resistance to glyphosate does not result in resistance to other antibiotic agents.  Antibiotics used in medicine today operate by very specifically blocking one or more steps in microbial metabolism.  Glyphosate inhibits a specific biochemical pathway involved in the production of protein precursors (aromatic amino acids).  Susceptible microbes cannot grow without this pathway unless they have access to an alternative source of these amino acids.  Specifically, glyphosate inhibits an enzyme, EPSPS, (enol-phosphate-shikimate-3-phosphate-synthase). Resistance to glyphosate in microbes is due to the existence of variants of EPSPS which are not inhibited by glyphosate.  None of the antibiotics we use today act on the specific metabolic step (EPSPS) inhibited by glyphosate, so glyphosate resistance does not confer resistance to other antibiotics.

 

Multiple antibiotic resistance in bacteria is sometimes due to a collection of antibiotic resistance genes grouped together on an inheritable ring of DNA called a plasmid.  When multiple antibiotic resistance genes travel together, the use of one antibiotic can select for resistance to multiple antibiotics.  The gene affected by glyphosate is not carried on such a plasmid, so use of glyphosate does not select for multiple resistant organisms.

 

At one time, scientists were interested in the possibility of using  glyphosate as an antibiotic  for exactly this reason- it has a unique mechanism and thus might help manage bacteria resistant to other antibiotics.  Glyphosate is not well absorbed orally and is very rapidly excreted, levels needed to kill microbes are relatively high, and resistance can develop readily, so it has never proven to be a clinically useful antibiotic.   

Posted on February 2, 2018
A former response to a similar question answered by Dave Kovalic, Regulatory New Technology Lead at Monsanto, also provides information on scientific advancements and how they [Monsanto] affirm safety prior to targeted vector insertion.   “For context, it is important to recognize that random genome insertions have been naturally occurring in crops over the ~10,000-year history of agriculture.  In some crops, more than 90 percent of the genome consists of these... Read More
Posted on February 2, 2018
In terms of the science behind the technology to create GMOs, scientists have a much better understanding how a transgene is delivered and stably integrated into a chromosome (or genome). Many GMO products, such as Bt corn, were made using Agrobacterium cells to deliver useful trait genes into the plant cells. Scientists were able to dissect the different steps of this natural gene delivery system encoded by Agrobacterium. We now have a good understanding of the interactions between... Read More
Posted on January 2, 2018
Thank you for your questions, we would like to address these individually.   Why are GMOs created if scientists are not aware if it is really harmful? and Are GMOs really safe if you’re mixing to different DNA strands? yes GMOs are safe. In fact, according to this response, “the overwhelming consensus of scientific experts and major scientific authorities around the world, including the World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and... Read More
Answer: