QWhy does Monsanto feel it is necessary to threaten and intimidate farmers, like Mr. Schmieser and other farmers in Canada and the US?

Why does Monsanto feel it is necessary to threaten and intimidate farmers, like Mr. Schmieser and other farmers in Canada and the US?

AExpert Answer

Farmers are our customers, and our goal in all our dealings with farmers is to treat them with a high degree of integrity, respect and transparency.  We work hard to breed and grow seeds that help farmers produce abundant and healthy food. We also work hard to earn the trust of our farmer customers, and we’re honored when they choose to buy and plant our seeds.

 

Like many companies that sell high-value seed, we ask farmers to plant our seeds only once, and if they like them, to buy new seeds for their next planting. If you think about it, the way we sell seed is really no different than the way most of us purchase a phone, computer software, or credit card – the purchase and use of these products comes with an agreement specifying certain terms of use. Farmers have many different seed choices, they understand the value of different types of seeds, they are very smart in making the best choices for each field that they farm, and they freely sign an agreement if they choose to purchase specific seeds.

 

The vast majority of our farmer customers stick to their agreements, but some don’t.  This gives them an unfair advantage over other farmers, because everyone else is paying for technology that they’re getting for free. That is not fair to farmers, and when we ask our farmer customers about this, more than 90% tell us they expect us to keep farming fair for everyone.

 

When cases like Mr. Schmeiser’s are brought to our attention, we follow a strict set of ethical and transparency guidelines that you can view on our web site.  It is very rare for these situations to end up in court, and it is a last resort that we pursue with farmers who have intentionally planted seeds they did not purchase.  We have never sued a farmer when trace amounts of our seeds or traits were present in a farmer’s field as an accident or as a result of inadvertent means such as cross pollination.  We have publically made that commitment. 

 

Regarding your reference to Mr. Schmeiser, several courts (including the Canadian Supreme Court) have affirmed that he violated our patent.  As indicated by the trial court in Canada, the seed was not blown in on the wind nor carried in by birds, and it didn’t spontaneously appear. Schmeiser knowingly planted this seed in his field without permission or license. By doing so, he used Monsanto’s patented technology without permission. In fact, the courts determined this in three separate decisions.  More detailed information regarding the situation with Mr. Schmeiser is available on our website if you are interested in additional information.

Posted on April 18, 2018
GMO Answers provides the facts that answer questions related to biotechnology, GM crops and agriculture. We work to ensure that the content and answers provided by experts and companies are accurate and therefore do not present opinions about GMOs, simply facts. GMO Answers is a community focused on constructive discussion about GMOs in order to have open conversations about agriculture and GMOs. This website is funded by the Council for Biotechnology Information. The Council... Read More
Posted on April 20, 2018
When glyphosate is applied to plants (e.g., crops or weeds) a certain percentage is absorbed and transported throughout the plant. The amount absorbed is variable depending on the application rate and the type of plant. Very little of the absorbed glyphosate is degraded by the plant and cannot be removed. Its persistence in plants is also variable. Federal regulatory agencies have established allowable limits for glyphosate residues in many different crops to protect human and animal health.... Read More
Answer:
Posted on March 21, 2018
Thank you for your question. This question has been previously been answered in this response. A snippet of is included below: “Jim Gaffney, PhD, Strategy Lead of Biotech Affairs and Regulatory at DuPont Pioneer says this: “In short, yes, genetically modified (GM) crops are one tool with great potential for helping feed the growing population. The challenge is not just one of increased productivity though, but also of improving prosperity for millions of smallholder farmers and... Read More
Answer: