QWhy did Monsanto need to purchase Blackwater Industries (and or any of their affiliates)? If they are supposed to be a company with a product that is aboveboard and legitimate, why are they working with a group that is clearly used as mercenaries and oft

Why did Monsanto need to purchase Blackwater Industries (and or any of their affiliates)? If they are supposed to be a company with a product that is aboveboard and legitimate, why are they working with a group that is clearly used as mercenaries and often under shady pretexts? If it's simply for local security of Monsanto's plants and personnel, why is there a need for them to own a mercenary style group? This act has not created any trust in Monsanto, and if anything it could be determined as to be a form of 'control by fear' of any group that might speak out against Monsanto.

AExpert Answer

We have never owned Blackwater or any part of Blackwater. Nor do we hire them or their affiliates, nor do we own or hire them under any other name (like Xe or Academi). But here’s how I think the idea that we do got started.

 

Like a lot of companies, we try to stay aware of threats to our employees or our business by keeping an eye on publicly available information such as websites and news reports. Sometimes we’ve hired outside companies to help us with this. Between 2008 and 2010, we hired a company called Total Intelligence Solutions (TIS) to help us monitor publicly available information.

 

In 2010, The Nation published a story about Blackwater.  In that story, the reporter said that TIS was part of Blackwater, and that TIS had spoken with us about having their people join animal rights groups. As I said, we did hire TIS for a while to monitor publicly available information. But we were told specifically at the time that they were not part of Blackwater. And they certainly never joined animal rights groups or any other group for us. We don’t have contractors infiltrate third party groups on our behalf nor do we do this ourselves.

 

As near as we can figure, this article seems to be where the idea got started. But the article doesn’t say or imply that we ever owned Blackwater or any part of Blackwater. It’s still available online if you’re interested in reading it. You can also check out this recent (2013) tweet from Jeremy Scahill, who was the author of the original story in The Nation: https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/360467680718880770

Posted on April 22, 2017
GMO plants, like all other plants, do not “sleep” in the sense that you and I as mammals sleep. However, plants do have natural processes that may be cyclic or seasonal, indicating a cycle or rhythm to their growth and life. This is not technically “sleeping” but let me give you a couple of examples of what I mean.    Some plants have a type of metabolism known as CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism). Plants which have CAM close the pores on their leaves... Read More
Posted on August 15, 2017
  On average, the recent research that has been conducted on GMOs, on a per product basis is calculated to be an average of $130 Million (and 13 years). This is a per product average, so each product that reaches commercialization in a given year would also cost something similar to this value.   Please see below for additional helpful resources: The Cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorization of a new plant biotechnology derived trait by Phillips... Read More
Posted on February 9, 2017
A species is defined by the ability to reproduce viable offspring, so any two plants within a species generally have the potential to cross pollinate. Like any good successful mating, it requires the union of male and female contributions at the right time, same place. So absolutely, GE crops have the potential to cross with non-GE crops of the same species—if they manage to get it on through time and space.    So the rules that apply to dogs and teenagers also apply to... Read More
Answer:

Explore More Topics