QIt is often said that horizontal transfer of genes between unrelated species, which is the primary method used to create GMOs, is also found in nature. I know that natural horizontal gene transfer results in negative outcomes to the host such as pathogens

It is often said that horizontal transfer of genes between unrelated species, which is the primary method used to create GMOs, is also found in nature. I know that natural horizontal gene transfer results in negative outcomes to the host such as pathogens and galls, but what examples are there of positive outcomes ( i.e. the result of the transfer of genes is of benefit to the host) between unrelated species in nature?

AExpert Answer

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) or lateral gene transfer (LGT) refers to transfer of genes between organisms other than through sexual or asexual reproduction (referred to as vertical gene transfer VGT). It is quite prevalent in prokaryotes and unicellular organisms but not as common in multicellular eukaryotes. As with mutation, HGT is mostly neutral and seldom negative but occasionally provides an advantage—for example, antibiotics resistance in bacteria. And in this regard, in the simpler organisms, it has played an important role in evolution. Straight infection of organisms with just the pathogenic DNA (e.g., crown gall disease) is usually not referred to as HRT if only introgression of pathogenic sequences is involved—transduction of genes from a previous host would have had to occur, and this has also been documented.

Under the endosymbiotic theory, subcellular organelles chloroplasts and mitochondria probably originated as bacterial endosymbionts of a progenitor to the eukaryotic cell. Analysis of DNA sequences suggests that horizontal gene transfer has also occurred within eukaryotes from the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes to the nuclear genome, but, again, this is a very limited notion of HGT. The massive accumulation of sequencing data shows extensive genetic similarity among genomes of diverse organisms that are only remotely related. For example, parts of the nucleic acid sequence of a common bacterium present in our guts, E. coli, have been found in the DNA of organisms such as oilseed rape, amphibians, birds, grasses and mammals—including humans. Such findings put in doubt the value of assigning genes to a particular species and the validity of using terms such as “species-specific DNA.” And HGT is a confounding factor in inferring phylogenetic trees based on the sequence of single genes.

Posted on September 5, 2017
While there might be some institutions with the capability to make these transgenic watermelon and coconut plants for you, that does not mean that you would be able to actually plant them out. First, the institution would need to have a Biological Use Authorization to work with recombinant DNA to make the vectors to transfer the genes. Then they would need to be able to do the tissue culture required to transfer the genes and regenerate whole plants again, which can sometimes be difficult.... Read More
Posted on June 28, 2017
The short answer is no, neither MSG or animal extraction are from GMOs, nor is MSG, animal extraction, or animal products/animal DNA in GMOs.   When people refer to Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), they are referring to precision plant breeding using genetic engineering (also called GE). It allows plant breeders to take a desirable trait (like resistance to drought, insects, weeds, and disease) from one plant or organism and transfer it to the plant... Read More
Answer:
Posted on June 28, 2017
No. MSG, monosodium glutamate, is a chemical additive, certainly not a GMO.
Answer: