QI was reading this article and it states that free inquiry is limited because of patent protection on GMO seeds:http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-researchThe article suggests this limit is unscientific, and

I was reading this article and it states that free inquiry is limited because of patent protection on GMO seeds: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-research The article suggests this limit is unscientific, and it seems so to me (as a layman) that it is. What can you tell me about this position the GMO seed companies take? How can it be scientific to not allow free inquiry ?

AExpert Answer

Davis, I LOVES me some Scientific American.  It always has been a pretty reasonable resource at the interface between science and an interested public.  I read the article you cited, and it is raised all the time by critics of biotech.  It is the one place in a reputable source where you'll find the claim that researchers cannot do research on Big Biotech's seeds.  Note the use of "one”.


Being a fan of SciAm, I can't fathom what must have been in the water cooler that day.  The work is authored by "The Editors" and they have been historically pretty good.  My guess is that this was in the transition in 2009 when John Rennie was leaving and perhaps something a little flimsy snuck in.


I say flimsy for two reasons.  First, any academic researcher can get the seeds, and second, anyone with a few hundred bucks can have transgenic plants made.


The Big Ag companies have Academic Research Licenses.  You are free to use their stuff, you just can’t grow it and sell it (duh).  There are no restrictions on publication and they don't care what you are up to.  A student I know recently went on an (unsuccessful) allergen search in some GM soybeans. It was simple to perform independent research without restriction.


You also can go to any of the several universities around the country and pay to have transgenic corn, canola, tomato, and a dozen other crops made.  It's reasonably cheap, like $600 per line.  That's not too much for a researcher with a hunch that GM food has a major problem.  A simple hypothesis with a few good controls might run a few grand, but that's peanuts compared to the Nobel Prize money if it turns out to be correct!


All of this is said understanding that there are significant restrictions on GM crops. In order to grow/use/handle the materials you have to be certified and play by USDA/APHIS rules, which means you have to have tight controls on insects, pests, pollen and must be able to destroy the materials.  Regulations are really tough!  That said, a phone call and a Fed Ex number and I could have materials in my hands in a few days.


In short, anyone claiming a conspiracy to squelch independent research just hasn't tried to do it.  There are many avenues to get the seeds, and since they have the most to lose, I'm guessing the big companies are THRILLED to have independent researchers find a problem if it were to really exist.

Posted on April 20, 2018
When glyphosate is applied to plants (e.g., crops or weeds) a certain percentage is absorbed and transported throughout the plant. The amount absorbed is variable depending on the application rate and the type of plant. Very little of the absorbed glyphosate is degraded by the plant and cannot be removed. Its persistence in plants is also variable. Federal regulatory agencies have established allowable limits for glyphosate residues in many different crops to protect human and animal health.... Read More
Posted on March 21, 2018
Thank you for your question. This question has been previously been answered in this response. A snippet of is included below: “Jim Gaffney, PhD, Strategy Lead of Biotech Affairs and Regulatory at DuPont Pioneer says this: “In short, yes, genetically modified (GM) crops are one tool with great potential for helping feed the growing population. The challenge is not just one of increased productivity though, but also of improving prosperity for millions of smallholder farmers and... Read More
Posted on March 1, 2018
The topic of labeling can be discussed in different ways. We hope the below information on GM food labeling is helpful and answers your question. Greg Conko, senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, discusses consumer choice and how food producers and retailers are labeling non-GMO products in this response. Here is an excerpt: “Countless scientific organizations agree that foods that contain GE ingredients are no less safe, no less nutritious and no less healthy... Read More

Explore More Topics