QI was reading this article and it states that free inquiry is limited because of patent protection on GMO seeds:http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-researchThe article suggests this limit is unscientific, and

I was reading this article and it states that free inquiry is limited because of patent protection on GMO seeds: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-research The article suggests this limit is unscientific, and it seems so to me (as a layman) that it is. What can you tell me about this position the GMO seed companies take? How can it be scientific to not allow free inquiry ?

AExpert Answer

Davis, I LOVES me some Scientific American.  It always has been a pretty reasonable resource at the interface between science and an interested public.  I read the article you cited, and it is raised all the time by critics of biotech.  It is the one place in a reputable source where you'll find the claim that researchers cannot do research on Big Biotech's seeds.  Note the use of "one”.

 

Being a fan of SciAm, I can't fathom what must have been in the water cooler that day.  The work is authored by "The Editors" and they have been historically pretty good.  My guess is that this was in the transition in 2009 when John Rennie was leaving and perhaps something a little flimsy snuck in.

 

I say flimsy for two reasons.  First, any academic researcher can get the seeds, and second, anyone with a few hundred bucks can have transgenic plants made.

 

The Big Ag companies have Academic Research Licenses.  You are free to use their stuff, you just can’t grow it and sell it (duh).  There are no restrictions on publication and they don't care what you are up to.  A student I know recently went on an (unsuccessful) allergen search in some GM soybeans. It was simple to perform independent research without restriction.

 

You also can go to any of the several universities around the country and pay to have transgenic corn, canola, tomato, and a dozen other crops made.  It's reasonably cheap, like $600 per line.  That's not too much for a researcher with a hunch that GM food has a major problem.  A simple hypothesis with a few good controls might run a few grand, but that's peanuts compared to the Nobel Prize money if it turns out to be correct!

 

All of this is said understanding that there are significant restrictions on GM crops. In order to grow/use/handle the materials you have to be certified and play by USDA/APHIS rules, which means you have to have tight controls on insects, pests, pollen and must be able to destroy the materials.  Regulations are really tough!  That said, a phone call and a Fed Ex number and I could have materials in my hands in a few days.

 

In short, anyone claiming a conspiracy to squelch independent research just hasn't tried to do it.  There are many avenues to get the seeds, and since they have the most to lose, I'm guessing the big companies are THRILLED to have independent researchers find a problem if it were to really exist.

Posted on April 22, 2017
GMO plants, like all other plants, do not “sleep” in the sense that you and I as mammals sleep. However, plants do have natural processes that may be cyclic or seasonal, indicating a cycle or rhythm to their growth and life. This is not technically “sleeping” but let me give you a couple of examples of what I mean.    Some plants have a type of metabolism known as CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism). Plants which have CAM close the pores on their leaves... Read More
Posted on August 15, 2017
  On average, the recent research that has been conducted on GMOs, on a per product basis is calculated to be an average of $130 Million (and 13 years). This is a per product average, so each product that reaches commercialization in a given year would also cost something similar to this value.   Please see below for additional helpful resources: The Cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorization of a new plant biotechnology derived trait by Phillips... Read More
Posted on February 9, 2017
A species is defined by the ability to reproduce viable offspring, so any two plants within a species generally have the potential to cross pollinate. Like any good successful mating, it requires the union of male and female contributions at the right time, same place. So absolutely, GE crops have the potential to cross with non-GE crops of the same species—if they manage to get it on through time and space.    So the rules that apply to dogs and teenagers also apply to... Read More
Answer: