QCan you give me some peer reviewed references that discuss the health effects of the various proteins expressed in Bt corn. In particular quoting Syngenta's website, Syngenta's Attribute II is supposedly active against Beet Armyworm (Spodoptera exigua),

Can you give me some peer reviewed references that discuss the health effects of the various proteins expressed in Bt corn. In particular quoting Syngenta's website, Syngenta's Attribute II is supposedly active against Beet Armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), Black Cutworm(Agrotis ipsilon), Common Stalk Borer(Papaipema nebris), Corn Earworm(Helicoverpa zea), Dingy Cutworm(Feltia jaculifera), European Corn Borer(Ostrinia nubilalis), Fall Armyworm(Spodoptera frugiperda), Southern Cornstalk Borer(Diatraea crambidoides), Southwestern Corn Borer(Diatraea grandiosella), Sugarcane Borer(Diatraea saccharalis), and Western Bean Cutworm(Striacosta albi). Has there been any long term studies of Attribute II's health effects?

AExpert Answer

Attribute II sweet corn expresses the vegetative insecticidal protein Vip3A and the crystalline protein Cry1Ab, both of which are derived from the naturally occurring soil microorganism Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).  Bt spores and proteins have been used worldwide for many decades in both organic and conventional farming as a direct application pesticide for vegetable and fruit crops, and thus there is a long history of safe use and exposure.  Both of these proteins are highly selective in terms of their toxicity because they bind to specific receptors that are found in the midgut of certain insect species, but not found in other insects or vertebrate animals.  These two proteins are therefore only toxic to the larvae (caterpillars) of certain Lepidopteran insects that are key agricultural pests, but are harmless to other insects, fish, reptiles, birds and mammals, including humans.  Here is a recent article that discusses the safety of Bt proteins that you may find useful:

 

Hammond B.G. and Koch M.S. (2012). A Review of the Food Safety of Bt Crops, In: Bacillus thuringiensis Biotechnology, E. Sansinenea (ed.). Springer: New York. Pp. 305-325.

 

To answer your second question, long term studies have not been conducted of Attribute II, nor are they necessary.  Attribute II expresses transgenic proteins which have been demonstrated to be: 1) rapidly digestible by humans as other dietary proteins, 2) denatured and inactivated by heat (as from cooking), and 3) completely nontoxic in laboratory mice and rats exposed to levels many hundreds of times higher than humans could possibly be exposed to.  As these proteins are easily digested and nontoxic, and as Attribute II sweet corn has been demonstrated to otherwise be substantially equivalent to conventional varieties of sweet corn, there is simply no need for further testing as there is no biological plausibility for chronic toxicity potential.  Here is a recent article that supports this position that long term studies are not necessary to evaluate the safety of genetically modified crops:

 

Snell C., Bernheim A., Bergé J.-B., Kuntz M., Pascal G., Paris A., Ricroch A.E. (2012). Assessment of the health impact of GM plants in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review. Food and Chemical Toxicology 50:1134-1148.

 

Lastly, expression of these proteins by Attribute II and other corn varieties is beneficial in terms of food safety.  Minimized insect feeding damage is directly correlated with reduced infection of the corn ear by the ubiquitous fungi that produce mycotoxins, many of which potent liver and kidney toxins and carcinogens.

Posted on June 28, 2017
The short answer is no, neither MSG or animal extraction are from GMOs, nor is MSG, animal extraction, or animal products/animal DNA in GMOs.   When people refer to Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), they are referring to precision plant breeding using genetic engineering (also called GE). It allows plant breeders to take a desirable trait (like resistance to drought, insects, weeds, and disease) from one plant or organism and transfer it to the plant... Read More
Answer:
Posted on June 28, 2017
No. MSG, monosodium glutamate, is a chemical additive, certainly not a GMO.
Answer:
Posted on June 28, 2017
Monosodium glutamate is mainly produced by a fermentation process with sugar as a starting material. It is not GMO. Plants that have been genetically modified do not contain any animal residue or byproducts.
Answer: