The Board of Directors of the International Food Information Council (IFIC) in Washington, DC elected David Schmidt as President & CEO effective January 1, 2006. Schmidt also serves as President & CEO of the International Food Information Council Foundation. Previously, he held the positions of executive vice president, vice president and director and has been a frequent speaker on a wide range of food safety and nutrition issues. Prior to joining IFIC in 1993, Schmidt served as the first Bush Administration's director of external affairs for the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
David B. Schmidt
From this Expert
Q: There are currently 61 countries worldwide that label food that has been genetically engineered. Why would food need a warning if it was safe to eat?
Posted On: Tuesday, 10/15/2013 4:41 pm
Answered By: David B. Schmidt, President & CEO, International Food Information Council (IFIC) Foundation, Wednesday, 10/16/2013 12:32 pm
A: In fact, you’ve answered your own question in a way. There is no need for mandatory labeling in the U.S. because biotech food is safe to eat. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ensures that food labels are truthful and not misleading. In fact, the FDA would not allow a warning label on foods produced using biotechnology, because they are safe to eat. (FDA has information regarding its assessment of the safety of “Foods from Genetically Engineered Plants”). Our surveys since 1997... Continue Reading
Q: If GMOs are not a concern, then why aren't they listed with the rest of the ingredients of a product?
Posted On: Tuesday, 8/20/2013 7:20 pm
Answered By: David B. Schmidt, President & CEO, International Food Information Council (IFIC) Foundation, Friday, 12/20/2013 8:37 pm
A: The FDA determines what ingredients are important to health and safety that should be listed on a food label. The process of producing foods using biotechnology itself does not trigger any material disclosures that would be required to be listed. However, the FDA policy already requires that if a biotechnology trait produced a protein not expected to be in a certain food, the presence of that protein must be identified on the label. In that case the specific protein, rather... Continue Reading
Q: If. Britain won't grow the stuff why has the USA saturated shops with it? We over here don't want freaky food , so why lie to poor old peeps in the america? Do you believe them to be somehow more gullibble or less intelligent? Americans...
Posted On: Monday, 8/05/2013 4:34 am
Answered By: David B. Schmidt, President & CEO, International Food Information Council (IFIC) Foundation, Monday, 10/07/2013 3:46 pm
A: Let me start by saying, there is absolutely no intention to deceive the American consumer by our regulatory bodies. We are fortunate in the United States that food safety determinations are made by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) at arm’s length from the political process. Our regulatory and science authorities like those around the world have confirmed the safety of foods produced using biotechnology. In fact there is no credible... Continue Reading
Q: If biotech industry leaders are scientifically confident that GMOs are 100% safe, why is the biotech industry spending millions of dollars to campaign against the American people who want the GMOs they buy labeled?
Posted On: Thursday, 8/01/2013 2:29 pm
Answered By: David B. Schmidt, President & CEO, International Food Information Council (IFIC) Foundation, Tuesday, 10/08/2013 1:28 pm
A: While I can’t speak for the biotech industry, there is an important principle at stake in many of these ballot measures. Activists and elements of the organic and natural food industries are spending millions of dollars to stigmatize conventional and biotech foods in order to promote their niche products, which are generally sold to consumers at a higher price. In essence, they are creating fear with unproven, outlandish allegations in order to get unsuspecting consumers to avoid... Continue Reading
Q: Isn't it true that the health consequences of eating genetically modified organisms are still largely unknown?
Posted On: Thursday, 8/01/2013 1:15 pm
Answered By: David B. Schmidt, President & CEO, International Food Information Council (IFIC) Foundation, Monday, 12/23/2013 10:24 pm
A: That is false, because a growing global consensus of leading experts in science, medical and regulatory agencies around the world have confirmed that there is no evidence of harm from consuming foods produced using biotechnology anywhere in the world. Any potential risks of consuming these foods are no greater than the safety of consuming conventional foods. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration and USDA review the science of all foods in commerce and have the... Continue Reading
No Studies were Found.