Labeling

QIve seen several commercials about a non GMO vitamin brand. How can vitamins be GMO and is this just pandering to people's fears?

Ive seen several commercials about a non GMO vitamin brand. How can vitamins be GMO and is this just pandering to people's fears?

AExpert Answer

Vitamins can be made from natural or synthetic substances and can also involve the use of bacteria, some of this can be derived from genetically engineered substances. Find more information here.

 

In order for a supplement to be "non-GMO" the manufacturer or brand that uses the vitamins would have to be able to trace multiple aspects of how the vitamins are made. If the supplement manufacturer elects to use "non-GMO" sources and label their product with the "non-GMO project" label it could be more expensive than others. There is no proof that "non-GMO' vitamins are more or less efficacious than their "GMO" counterparts. 

 

In some cases when brands seek to become "non -GMO" project verified, rather than utilize "non-GMO" vitamins, they simply eliminate vitamins altogether so that they don't have to add to the cost of the product. See this article from NPR on how this happened for cereals. 

QAre there countries which require animal feed to be labeled GMO if the feed contains GMO ingredients e.g. corn or soybean?

Are there countries which require animal feed to be labeled GMO if the feed contains GMO ingredients e.g. corn or soybean?

AExpert Answer

Yes, the EU is one of the geographies where GM-derived food and animal feed must be labeled according to conditions outlined by the European Commission on this webpage. GM labels are very common on sacks of animal feed. Depending on the type of animal, GM labeled feed is often the standard – except of course when it comes to GM free or organic supply chains.

GMOAnswers Admin's picture

HANDOUT: Get To Know GMOs

QWhat is the difference between a GMO and a product produced with genetic engineering? We got a mustard that says its a product produced with genetic engineering but non of the ingredients listed are GMOs. We are proGMO, just curious!

What is the difference between a GMO and a product produced with genetic engineering? We got a mustard that says its a product produced with genetic engineering but non of the ingredients listed are GMOs. We are proGMO, just curious!

AExpert Answer

The broad scientific definition of a GMO is any organism that has had its genome (DNA) modified. This of course includes virtually all food crops as domestication or breeding is, by its very nature, the modification of the genome of that crop. There are very few foods that have not been genetically modified by humans: wild fish, game, berries and mushrooms.

 

Some “traditional” forms of breeding cause massive changes to the DNA. Examples include ionizing radiation mutagenesis or chemical mutagenesis that randomly change the DNA. There are thousands of commercial food crops made with these methods. Although thousands of changes to the DNA occur with these traditional breeding methods, there is zero testing to determine the full extent of the DNA changes and virtually no safety testing of crops bred using these traditional methods.

 

Now in today’s public arenas “GMO” refers to food crops that have had changes to their DNA using recombinant DNA techniques. A better term is genetically engineered (GE) as the specific DNA changes are carried out using recombinant DNA technologies. So with this definition most herbicide tolerant canola are GMOs but the oil from this GE crop is a product of genetic engineering. The oil itself is not a GMO. The same would apply to sugar, vitamins, starch and other derived compounds that might become ingredients in food. They are all products of genetic engineering but none are genetically modified organisms. 

 

Sometimes the entire crop is processed whole into foods. For example the new GE potato on the market has been engineered to be blight resistant, has reduced bruising and lower levels of acrylamide. If you eat French fries made from whole GE potatoes you are consuming a GMO though scientists would call it a GE product.

 

These are genetically engineered crops (aka GMOs) presently on the market: canola, corn, soy, sugar beets, alfalfa, papaya, cotton, eggplant, potato, apple and squash.

 

There are many more in advanced stages of development around the world including the first GE animal food product. GE salmon will soon reach the U.S. market. In this case the GE salmon would correctly be referred to as a GMO.

 

As for your question about the mustard I suspect one of the oils or soy products is derived from a GE crop. GE Mustard itself (related to canola) is soon to go into field trials in India. 

 

Here are four links to excellent reviews of GE crops (aka GMOs):

A Decade of EU-Funded GMO Research 2001-2010

The Impact of Genetically Engineered on Farm Sustainability in the United States 2010

Planting the Future 2013

Genetically Engineered Crops- Experiences and Prospects 2016

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to RSS - Labeling