QWhy is the spliced genes action on the dna stranded differnt from other genes that are normally there

Why is the spliced genes action on the dna stranded differnt from other genes that are normally there

AExpert Answer

I think this question is asking about how a gene that is inserted is different from the resident genes within the organism. It is an important question, but the answer is complex, so I’ll provide a starting point. I’m glad to go deeper for you if you’d like, so contact me directly or I can continue answering here on GMOAnswers.com.

 

First, a quick lesson in how genes work. When we think of a “gene,” this is the information that leads to a trait, PLUS the information that regulates it. All genes are composed of the same basic building blocks, adenine, thymidine, cytosine and guanine, the A,T,C and G in the genetic code. The order of A’s, T’s, G’s and C’s encodes the information to produce a trait. Again, some of the code is the information for the trait. The rest of the code simply turns it on and off.

 

So if you wanted to make a GE plant, like a banana that could help the developing world by producing more beta-carotene (the carrot vitamin), you might take the sequences from carrots or daffodils and place them in banana, downstream of a strong regulatory sequence that turns them on all the time. This is seriously just biological Legos.

 

The major production traits are glyphosate tolerance and insect resistance. In both of these cases a sequence from bacteria is added to the plant, under the control of sequences that turn them on at high levels.  While these both come from bacteria, it does not matter too much.  Bacteria use the same A,G,C,T code, they just have a little different hardware to process that from information to final product. It is like how your USB drive works in any computer—while Macs and PCs are different, they know how to use the same information.

 

So the best answer to your question is that they are the same in their composition, nothing weird or magical. They are different in that their functional units might be mixed and matched in ways that allow the trait to be expressed in ways that best support the trait. That trait might be to help the farmer use less insecticide or fuel. In the future, new technologies will help in other ways, like providing higher quality fruits and vegetables, or producing plants that can help the neediest. That’s pretty exciting, and all from the same basic code.

Posted on September 5, 2017
While there might be some institutions with the capability to make these transgenic watermelon and coconut plants for you, that does not mean that you would be able to actually plant them out. First, the institution would need to have a Biological Use Authorization to work with recombinant DNA to make the vectors to transfer the genes. Then they would need to be able to do the tissue culture required to transfer the genes and regenerate whole plants again, which can sometimes be difficult.... Read More
Posted on June 19, 2017
Yes, the EU is one of the geographies where GM-derived food and animal feed must be labeled according to conditions outlined by the European Commission on this webpage. GM labels are very common on sacks of animal feed. Depending on the type of animal, GM labeled feed is often the standard – except of course when it comes to GM free or organic supply chains. Read More
Answer:
Posted on June 28, 2017
The short answer is no, neither MSG or animal extraction are from GMOs, nor is MSG, animal extraction, or animal products/animal DNA in GMOs.   When people refer to Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), they are referring to precision plant breeding using genetic engineering (also called GE). It allows plant breeders to take a desirable trait (like resistance to drought, insects, weeds, and disease) from one plant or organism and transfer it to the plant... Read More
Answer: