QWhy does the President's Cancer Panel 2008-2009 Report urge the President to remove toxins including pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides from our air, soil, and water but Biotech companies continually create chemicals that are doing the exact opposite?

Why does the President's Cancer Panel 2008-2009 Report urge the President to remove toxins including pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides from our air, soil, and water but Biotech companies continually create chemicals that are doing the exact opposite? Why do studies show an increase in use of pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides in GMO crops? There is cause and effect in everything we do. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/28/us-parkinsons-disease-idUSBRE94R0TL20130528

AExpert Answer

First, it’s important to note that the report you reference was criticized when it was released for claiming that “the true burden of environmentally (i.e., pollution) induced cancer has been grossly underestimated.” An ABC News reporter wrote at the time: “But paging through the lengthy report, it was difficult to find solid science to back that strong statement.” The American Cancer Society pointed out in a statement about the report that its conclusion “does not represent scientific consensus” but rather “reflects one side of a scientific debate.”

 

Second, pesticides in use today have been thoroughly evaluated for environmental and human safety. The Environmental Protection Agency regulates the sale and use of pesticides and requires robust studies and lengthy testing to demonstrate safety before any product reaches the market. Many products on the market today have specific modes of action for a target pest. An example of a class of crop protection chemistry that is marketed by DuPont and remains popular is sulfonylurea herbicides. These herbicides are used at very low rates (often less than one-tenth of a pound per acre) and disrupt an enzymatic pathway found only in plants, and therefore have minimal impact on other organisms (e.g., humans, birds, insects). For all products, strict handling requirements are implemented to limit potential farmworker exposure and also to limit products’ potential exposure to the environment and other non–target organisms.

 

On a personal note, I grew up on a farm, and my father, other family members and neighbors have used crop protection products all their lives and remain healthy and productive. While this is simply an observation, there are hundreds of thousands of family farmers across the country with a similar history of crop protection product safety.

Posted on November 17, 2017
A similar question has been answered here  If you have any additional questions, please ask! Read More
Answer:
Posted on November 10, 2017
GMOs can affect the environment in many ways, and this response discusses the many ways in which GMOs can benefit the environment and the impact GM crops have on the environment. The data in this response from Brookes and Barfoot is from 2013, updated information can be found in their most recent report here.   Additionally, these infographics are helpful in explaining how GMOs can help preserve the habitat and H2O, protect the environment and improve soil health.   Kevin Folta,... Read More
Answer:
Posted on November 17, 2017
The topic of labeling can be discussed in many different ways. We hope the below information on labeling GM food addresses your question.   The issue of GMO labeling, the consumer choice and logistical impacts of labeling genetically engineered food is discussed in this response.   Scott Kohne, NAFTA market acceptance manager for the Seeds Unit at Bayer, explains the difference between labeling in different countries vs. labeling GMO products in the U.S. Read his full response... Read More
Answer: