QBy refusing to label it, your forcing the population to consume your product. So if someone is allergic to peanuts, they don't have the right to know their eating peanuts because it might hurt the peanut market. GOSH, WHAT A WONDERFUL COMPANY YOU ARE!!!

By refusing to label it, your forcing the population to consume your product. So if someone is allergic to peanuts, they don't have the right to know their eating peanuts because it might hurt the peanut market. GOSH, WHAT A WONDERFUL COMPANY YOU ARE!!!

AExpert Answer

I would also be very concerned if a known food allergen, like peanuts, was not listed on a package label. This is a legitimate health and safety issue, and the fact is that FDA requires products containing the 8 foods known to cause 90 percent of food allergies to be labeled as such. These 8 foods are: milk, eggs, fish, crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, wheat, peanuts, and soybeans.  The only GMO food in this list that is on the market today is soy. So, if a food product contains GMO soy or organic soy ingredients, that package must have a label noting the presence of an allergen.

 

For more information on food allergen labels, see this Consumer Update on FDA’s website: http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm254504.htm.

 

Also, we’ve recently posted a new, detailed response on food allergens from Registered Dietitian, Lisa Katic. Find her answer here: http://gmoanswers.com/ask/hi-kimberly-schneider-again-i-wanted-clear-concise-answer-my-question-about-substantial-increase.

 

Now, to your other point about forcing people to eat our products. We fully support consumer choice and have no intention of forcing anyone to eat GMOs. Personally, I eat exactly what I want, and sometimes that’s organic food and sometimes it’s not. My food choices often depend on what’s on sale at the grocery store, or my craving that afternoon.

 

While we stand by the safety and nutrition of foods containing GMO ingredients (and many stand with us: http://gmopundit.blogspot.com.au/p/450-published-safety-assessments.html), we recognize that you may not be convinced. That’s one reason why we created this website – so that you could voice your concerns, ask questions and receive information to help you make informed decisions. It’s also why we support voluntary labeling and the marketplace’s ability to use labels, like non-GMO and certified USDA Organic, to differentiate and promote those products that don’t contain GMO ingredients.   

 

Posted on August 18, 2017
Vitamins can be made from natural or synthetic substances and can also involve the use of bacteria, some of this can be derived from genetically engineered substances. Find more information here.   In order for a supplement to be "non-GMO" the manufacturer or brand that uses the vitamins would have to be able to trace multiple aspects of how the vitamins are made. If the supplement manufacturer elects to use "non-GMO" sources and label... Read More
Answer:
Posted on August 15, 2017
No! However, poor nutrition coupled with highly processed foods and a lack of education regarding healthy eating is bad for our kids. As a mother and farmer, I believe the best way to keep my family safe and healthy is to make sure they eat a balanced diet and make good food choices daily. Fresh, healthy ingredients and minimally processed foods that are low in sugar, salt, calories and cholesterol provide kids with the best opportunity for a healthy diet. Agricultural biotechnology... Read More
Answer:
Posted on February 9, 2017
A species is defined by the ability to reproduce viable offspring, so any two plants within a species generally have the potential to cross pollinate. Like any good successful mating, it requires the union of male and female contributions at the right time, same place. So absolutely, GE crops have the potential to cross with non-GE crops of the same species—if they manage to get it on through time and space.    So the rules that apply to dogs and teenagers also apply to... Read More
Answer:

Explore More Topics