QAs a farmer growing Bt Cotton in India Since 2004,I would like to know Why European Union and countries like Japan oppose GM Crop?

As a farmer growing Bt Cotton in India Since 2004,I would like to know Why European Union and countries like Japan oppose GM Crop?

AExpert Answer

I believe your question is asking about cultivation of GMOs.


As you may know, there are very few bans in place for GMOs including bans for cultivation.  In most countries, where there are differences in the number of approvals for the importation of GMOs for food and feed use and approvals for cultivation use, governments simply have not yet approved various GMO crops for cultivation.  This is largely because either the developer of the GMO seed has not sought/is not interested in an approval for cultivation, as is the case in Japan for some GMOs, or because there are political delays in the approval system, which is the situation in the European Union.


Japan, a country with a functioning, science-based regulatory process for GM products, had approved 130 GMO products for food use and the 95 crops for environmental release (including  cultivation) by mid-2011.


In contrast, the European Union has been plagued by regulatory delays in the final step of the approval process for GMO crops—a political decision-making process in which the members states vote on the European Food Safety Authority scientific opinion.  As such, by mid-2011, 39 GM products had been approved for food and feed use in the EU, 72 approvals were stuck in the regulatory process, and just two GMOs had been approved for cultivation.  The irony is that while the EU does not grow many of the GM crops that other farmers around that world can choose to do, it also cannot grow enough food or animal feed to sustain its population using conventional or organic agriculture.  As a result, despite the political interference that causes delays in the European approval process, the EU imported 72 percent of the protein-rich feed needed to support its livestock industry in 2011 from Brazil, Argentina and the United States, the vast majority of which is GMO.


It’s important to note that the safety assessment process for GMOs  is similar around the world—in India, the EU, Japan, China, Brazil, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States and in many, many other countries. Each has determined that GMOs are substantially equivalent to their non GMO counterparts.

Posted on July 21, 2017
GMOs aren't really added directly to the meat, beef.  However, beef cattle may consume feed that comes from a genetically modified plant. All beef cattle begin their lives on a farm or ranch, grazing pasture or grass - none of which is considered a GMO. For many cows this will be their sole source of feed for their lifetime. Some cattle receive rations of grain, which may contain corn or soybeans, both of which have genetically modified hybrids and varieties. ... Read More
Posted on March 28, 2017
Thanks for the question, which I will address in two ways here.   1. What are three ways that organisms are modified by scientists? Here I will focus only on plants.   a. Agrobacterium: Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Agro) is a naturally occurring soil organism that causes a disease in plants called crown gall disease. In the late 1970s, Mary-Dell Chilton discovered that Agro actually transfers genes (DNA) from the Agro to the plant cell, where it becomes integrated into the plant... Read More
Posted on March 2, 2017
First of all, to clarify – hybridization is part of conventional breeding and conventional breeding uses hybridization to create new combinations of genes from parent varieties. For example, a disease-resistant wheat variety may be hybridized to a variety that makes flour better suited for making whole wheat bread. This is a common goal of most conventional breeding programs. It typically involves taking pollen from one parent and using it to fertilize another parent. The... Read More