QAs a farmer growing Bt Cotton in India Since 2004,I would like to know Why European Union and countries like Japan oppose GM Crop?

As a farmer growing Bt Cotton in India Since 2004,I would like to know Why European Union and countries like Japan oppose GM Crop?

AExpert Answer

I believe your question is asking about cultivation of GMOs.


As you may know, there are very few bans in place for GMOs including bans for cultivation.  In most countries, where there are differences in the number of approvals for the importation of GMOs for food and feed use and approvals for cultivation use, governments simply have not yet approved various GMO crops for cultivation.  This is largely because either the developer of the GMO seed has not sought/is not interested in an approval for cultivation, as is the case in Japan for some GMOs, or because there are political delays in the approval system, which is the situation in the European Union.


Japan, a country with a functioning, science-based regulatory process for GM products, had approved 130 GMO products for food use and the 95 crops for environmental release (including  cultivation) by mid-2011.


In contrast, the European Union has been plagued by regulatory delays in the final step of the approval process for GMO crops—a political decision-making process in which the members states vote on the European Food Safety Authority scientific opinion.  As such, by mid-2011, 39 GM products had been approved for food and feed use in the EU, 72 approvals were stuck in the regulatory process, and just two GMOs had been approved for cultivation.  The irony is that while the EU does not grow many of the GM crops that other farmers around that world can choose to do, it also cannot grow enough food or animal feed to sustain its population using conventional or organic agriculture.  As a result, despite the political interference that causes delays in the European approval process, the EU imported 72 percent of the protein-rich feed needed to support its livestock industry in 2011 from Brazil, Argentina and the United States, the vast majority of which is GMO.


It’s important to note that the safety assessment process for GMOs  is similar around the world—in India, the EU, Japan, China, Brazil, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States and in many, many other countries. Each has determined that GMOs are substantially equivalent to their non GMO counterparts.

Posted on December 7, 2017
The term “GMO” typically refers to crops or animals that, through genetic engineering, have had a gene (or a few genes) from a different species inserted into their genome. This is by design to improve a crop or animal with genetic engineering. In fact, me and my colleagues recently published a paper on this very topic that addresses this very topic and gives more details on the plant selection practices used for GE crops.   However, you pick up on something very... Read More
Posted on December 7, 2017
Nearly all foods today have been genetically modified or altered in some way over thousands of years through selective breeding. However, there are only 10 commercially available GMO crops in the U.S: soybeans, corn (field and sweet), canola, cotton, alfalfa, sugar beets, summer squash, papaya, potatoes and apples.   Below is a table outlining what year the nine crops became commercially available:   Squash 1995 Cotton 1996... Read More
Posted on November 17, 2017
When people refer to Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), they are referring to precision plant breeding using genetic engineering. It allows plant breeders to take a desirable trait (like resistance to drought, insects, weeds, and disease) from one plant or organism and transfer it to the plant they want to improve, as well as make a change to an existing trait in a plant they are developing. You may have also heard of agricultural biotechnology or biotech seeds.... Read More