QCan the act of some farmers planting GMOs negatively affect the ability of other farmers to practice organic farming?

Can the act of some farmers planting GMOs negatively affect the ability of other farmers to practice organic farming?

AExpert Answer

One of the great things about farming is our ability to grow many different crops, while at the same time having the choices to raise them in different fashions, with or without biotech in the crops, especially in crops like corn. This can also be challenging as we have to work with our neighbors to make sure what we are growing doesn't cause a negative effect on what they are growing. This can happen in many different instances. 

 

We raise production seed corn, which is the corn that will be planted by farmers next year. Having a farmer grow white corn, popcorn and sweet corn, for example, too close to those fields can have a negative impact on the quality of corn that will be planted the next year. This means we have to talk to our neighbors to see what they are growing to make sure we have the proper distance from those corn crops, like popcorn, so there isn't an issue. The same is true when dealing with neighbors who have adopted organic crop practices. They will reach out to see what is next to them to make sure there is not an issue that may cause some of their product to be rejected, as they try to maintain a pure organic standard.  

 

The main issue is that all of us in the farming community need to learn to communicate what we are doing so we can co-exist no matter what our cropping practices.

Posted on May 4, 2018
There would be more public seed development if genome editing technologies like CRISPR are not regulated as GMOs. Single point mutations are an extension of the undirected mutation breeding that is commonly used now. Having genome editing regulated like conventional plant breeding would allow university plant breeders to use the technology to develop new varieties without the stigmatism of them being GMOs. As for would it allow for more start-up seed companies, this is more doubtful. It is... Read More
Posted on May 4, 2018
There would be more public seed development if genome editing technologies like CRISPR are not regulated as GMOs. Single point mutations are an extension of the undirected mutation breeding that is commonly used now. Having genome editing regulated like conventional plant breeding would allow university plant breeders to use the technology to develop new varieties without the stigmatism of them being GMOs. As for would it allow for more start-up seed companies, this is more doubtful. It is... Read More
Posted on April 18, 2018
GMO Answers provides the facts that answer questions related to biotechnology, GM crops and agriculture. We work to ensure that the content and answers provided by experts and companies are accurate and therefore do not present opinions about GMOs, simply facts. GMO Answers is a community focused on constructive discussion about GMOs in order to have open conversations about agriculture and GMOs. This website is funded by the Council for Biotechnology Information. The Council... Read More

Explore More Topics