Jump to navigation
Impact on Society
Impact on Environment
Impact on Farms
Safety, Health, and Nutrition
Future of GMO
Science and GMO Basics
Government Oversight and Product Approvals
Last 3 Months
Voting Closed Flag (field_voting_closed_flag)
- Any -
No questions match....
Before Expert Answer
Like with any other new technology, the general public may not immediately understand the hard science behind it, or the full extent to which it can be applied. The media is certainly no exception, in fact they tend to exasperate situations. You will find many people making grand, broad statements, without ever getting into specifics. Science rarely works in such absolutes. The media has to make generalizations because they dont have the background knowledge to speak intelligently about a single case. This also leads to accidental spreads of misinformation, when they try to relate ideas that they dont have full command over
Here is a study, recently out of the EU: http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nicolia-20131.pdf I assume they are the " educated, urban elites in developed nations". Also, take a look at the public review tab at the top of this page. The map shows that the EU has accepted these technologies more recently. The only areas that still oppose it are parts of Africa and the Middle East, not exactly known to be on the progressive side of intellectual discovery.
The Precautionary Principle is often over used by people when dealing with new science. It’s hard to really blame them, they are scared and what they have often gets them by just fine (for the time being). But if it wasn’t for people like Ford, the Wright Bros, Edison, Einstein, that took many leaps in what they could create and do, where would we be now? Still riding horses? Using lanterns? Definitely not having these discussions online! As for the media, I don’t think anyone can argue that they latch on to anything that is sensational. You don’t sell more copies than the next guy by running articles that say, “GMO crops no different than other crops” or “Everyone still healthy. No changes” As proof to that, here is a quote from the facebook page of something that you may think sounds like a good site out to health the world and been environmentally conscious. Sustainable Pulse “BTW- All PR is good good PR- so even if some of our extreme pics are not technically correct – we have an aim and we will achieve it – as we already have with EFSA”
In Europe for example, they take a more cautionary approach to implementing new technologies because of a historical record of numerous (and notorious) new technologies and products that were put on the market, notably in the U.S., only to discover after the fact long term negative effects, unintended consequences or down right deception from the promoters of these new technologies or products. The mentality in the U.S. puts more faith and trust in industry, government and institutions in being honest and doing due diligence PRIOR to putting the next "new" thing on the market. Alas, history demonstrates time and time again that financial gain and arrogance lead people to tout and commercialize new technologies and new products before they have been proven to be safe — safe now and in the future.
Jacques, if it makes you feel any better, the paper I posted above came out of Italy, so it appears Europe is on board with these new technologies as well.