14
Comments:

Filter Questions

Reset Filter

No questions match....

  • Seeking.the.Truth's picture
    Seeking.the.Truth
    09.08.2013
    Actually, at least one long-term study has been done and it was discredited right away by many scientists and government groups. That was the Seralini study. In fact, that 2-year study showed that rats developed tumors 4-7 months, I believe, into the study. Most of Monsanto's studies seem to be 3 month studies, which did not show tumors. Since the study came out, there have been scientists who have stepped up to defend it.
  • ieatfood's picture
    ieatfood
    08.20.2013
    certain ailments have increased in the past twenty years, autism, stomach ailments, cancer to just name a few. There are relations to these ailments with our digestive systems. I don't have an article right now to cite so I will just say it is rumored that autism may come from stomach ailments perhaps a bacteria, cancer we know is directly related to the food we eat and the air we breath. So with these rises in ailments why shouldn't we look to our food to see what has changed. Maybe gmo food is fine for a bunch of people but not fine for a few maybe it is actually causing sickness in certain systems, so then give us the right to choose. Give parents of sick children, caretakers of cancer victims, the ability to avoid a product that has little research to prove its safety. If you stand so strong behind your product then stop hiding it on our shelves, LABEL IT!
  • Katie Johnson's picture
    Katie Johnson
    08.18.2013
    As far as allergies and GMOs go, people often confuse correlation with causation. I completely agree with the statement that it seems more and more people are getting allergies. However, you have to realize that with advances in science and technology, more allergies are able to be spotted...not necessarily more are "forming." For example, my Aunt just recently found out about a gluten allergy. She's had it her whole life, but just recently it has been able to be pointed out by doctors. A lot of people are blaming this seemingly "new" issue on the greater consumption of GMOs, when in reality, the allergies were always there, they just were unable to be spotted.
  • Community Manager's picture
    Community Manager
    08.16.2013
    @Iseekthetruth13: We ask that you cite sources and please try to be as accurate as possible in your comments. We aim to foster a fact-based and non-confrontational conversation about GMOs, please keep this in mind when you post comments.
  • Iseekthetruth13's picture
    Iseekthetruth13
    08.15.2013
    No long term studies have been done. These "foods" are digested, but at a cost. They mimic the way their natural cousins are digested but leave behind harmful residue that make us sick. It's appalling.
  • Community Manager's picture
    Community Manager
    08.15.2013
    Additionally, the FDA addresses many common questions about GMOs here: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/Biotechnology/ucm346030.htm. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization have also posted a thorough report which reviews the allergenicity of genetically modified foods, available here: ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/allergygm.pdf
  • Community Manager's picture
    Community Manager
    08.15.2013
    @Veronica a similar question regarding the Seralini study of rats is also under review by one of our experts.Please stay tuned for a response which will be posted here http://gmoanswers.com/ask/have-you-reviewed-study-showing-gmos-caused-cancer-lab-rats
  • Veronica's picture
    Veronica
    07.31.2013
    Are you saying that when Monsanto did the studies there were no rats with tumors?
  • AHuman's picture
    AHuman
    07.31.2013
    There was a study done on rats. The results, and resulting treatment of the scientist says it all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Árpád_Pusztai
  • rickspalding's picture
    rickspalding
    07.29.2013
    this is a link to the pdf. The only issue at hand is Rodale is pro organic. Can you say they fudged the numbers for their own benefit? It's possible but there is not other quantitative data analysis with as much info as this one. It is still helpful. You have to remember biotech food was created in the 60's. Yet was not available for human consumption until the 90's, I believe. http://66.147.244.123/~rodalein/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/FSTbookletFINAL.pdf
  • surroundsound's picture
    surroundsound
    07.29.2013
    Which study are you referring to? Can you please name the study and/or give the link?
  • rickspalding's picture
    rickspalding
    07.29.2013
    buddy use rational thought. The study was for comparative review on the functional process on just GROWING for yields. No long term tests have been done to see how it affects the body on a cellular level.
  • surroundsound's picture
    surroundsound
    07.29.2013
    @rickspalding on your other comment (http://gmoanswers.com/ask/some-studies-show-genetically-modified-crops-do-not-actually-increase-yields-or-reduction) you mention that a 30-yr old study was done. That sounds pretty long term. But now you are saying that a long-term study has not been done? Which is it??
  • rickspalding's picture
    rickspalding
    07.29.2013
    No one truly knows. There are no long term studies. That is why the corporations don't want them labelled. Most of the population doesn't even know GMO exists. What a better way than use the current consumers as a guinea pig.